↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Current trends in the prevalence of Cryptococcus gattii in the United States and Canada

Overview of attention for article published in Infection and Drug Resistance, May 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (80th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
42 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
69 Mendeley
Title
Current trends in the prevalence of Cryptococcus gattii in the United States and Canada
Published in
Infection and Drug Resistance, May 2015
DOI 10.2147/idr.s57686
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ana Espinel-Ingroff, Sarah E Kidd

Abstract

The incidence of Cryptococcus gattii infections in both Canada and the United States (US) is provided in this literature review beyond the British Columbia (BC) outbreak (1999-2013). Based on a search of the literature, case reports of C. gattii human infections including the prevalent molecular genotypes causing these infections in both Canada and the US have been documented since the C. gattii outbreak in BC. The literature reveals that: i) although C. gattii infections continue to be reported in both countries, the preliminary overall number of confirmed C. gattii infections may be decreasing in both Canada and the US (~23 cases each in 2012 versus ~17 and 20 cases, respectively in 2013); ii) C. gattii genotype distribution is region-dependent; iii) C. gattii is more frequently isolated from infections in the immunocompromised host (including acquired immune deficiency syndrome [AIDS] infection) than previously expected; iv) although pulmonary disease is higher than in C. neoformans infections, central nervous system disease is also reported among patients infected with C. gattii.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 69 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
South Africa 1 1%
Unknown 68 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 13 19%
Student > Bachelor 10 14%
Researcher 9 13%
Student > Postgraduate 8 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 7%
Other 10 14%
Unknown 14 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 15 22%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 13 19%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 12%
Immunology and Microbiology 7 10%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 1%
Other 6 9%
Unknown 19 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 August 2018.
All research outputs
#4,623,140
of 25,584,565 outputs
Outputs from Infection and Drug Resistance
#179
of 2,048 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#53,964
of 279,338 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Infection and Drug Resistance
#4
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,584,565 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,048 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 279,338 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.