↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

The neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio is associated with severity of rheumatic mitral valve stenosis

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Blood Medicine, May 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
33 Mendeley
Title
The neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio is associated with severity of rheumatic mitral valve stenosis
Published in
Journal of Blood Medicine, May 2015
DOI 10.2147/jbm.s82423
Pubmed ID
Authors

Erkan Baysal, Cengiz Burak, Serkan Cay, Tolga Aksu, Bernas Altıntaş, Barış Yaylak, Utkan Sevük, Önder Bilge

Abstract

Rheumatic heart disease (RHD) is a serious health concern in developing countries. Rheumatic mitral stenosis (RMS) is the most long-term sequel in RHD. The neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR) is a novel marker, and a higher NLR has been associated with poor clinical outcomes in various cardiovascular disorders. We evaluated the availability of NLR to predict severity of mitral stenosis (MS) in patients with RHD. We analyzed 300 consecutive patients with RMS. The patients were divided into tertiles according to NLR: 0.85< NLR ≤1.85 (n=100, tertile 1), 1.86≤ NLR ≤2.46 (n=100, tertile 2), and 2.47≤ NLR ≤7.08 (n=100, tertile 3). Patients with RMS were divided into three groups based on the degree of MS as mild, moderate, and severe MS. After the initial evaluation, 187 patients with moderate-to-severe RMS (Group 1) and 113 patients with mild RMS (Group 2) were reassessed. The patients with severe RMS had significantly elevated NLR, mean platelet volume, and pulmonary artery systolic pressure values compared to patients with moderate and mild MS (P<0.001, P<0.001, P<0.001 respectively). Multivariate binary logistic regression analysis revealed that high levels of NLR was an independent predictor of severe RMS (odds ratio =0.68, P=0.008). Moderate-to-severe RMS incidence was significantly higher among patients in the tertile 3 (odds ratio =2.8, P=0.001). NLR is a new inflammatory marker and a simple, rapid, and easily accessible prognostic parameter that can be associated with severity of RMS in patients with RHD.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 33 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 33 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 6 18%
Student > Bachelor 5 15%
Researcher 4 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 9%
Student > Master 3 9%
Other 8 24%
Unknown 4 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 21 64%
Environmental Science 1 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 3%
Psychology 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 7 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 May 2015.
All research outputs
#20,271,607
of 22,803,211 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Blood Medicine
#241
of 288 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#222,778
of 264,354 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Blood Medicine
#8
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,803,211 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 288 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.3. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 264,354 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.