Title |
The neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio is associated with severity of rheumatic mitral valve stenosis
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Blood Medicine, May 2015
|
DOI | 10.2147/jbm.s82423 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Erkan Baysal, Cengiz Burak, Serkan Cay, Tolga Aksu, Bernas Altıntaş, Barış Yaylak, Utkan Sevük, Önder Bilge |
Abstract |
Rheumatic heart disease (RHD) is a serious health concern in developing countries. Rheumatic mitral stenosis (RMS) is the most long-term sequel in RHD. The neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR) is a novel marker, and a higher NLR has been associated with poor clinical outcomes in various cardiovascular disorders. We evaluated the availability of NLR to predict severity of mitral stenosis (MS) in patients with RHD. We analyzed 300 consecutive patients with RMS. The patients were divided into tertiles according to NLR: 0.85< NLR ≤1.85 (n=100, tertile 1), 1.86≤ NLR ≤2.46 (n=100, tertile 2), and 2.47≤ NLR ≤7.08 (n=100, tertile 3). Patients with RMS were divided into three groups based on the degree of MS as mild, moderate, and severe MS. After the initial evaluation, 187 patients with moderate-to-severe RMS (Group 1) and 113 patients with mild RMS (Group 2) were reassessed. The patients with severe RMS had significantly elevated NLR, mean platelet volume, and pulmonary artery systolic pressure values compared to patients with moderate and mild MS (P<0.001, P<0.001, P<0.001 respectively). Multivariate binary logistic regression analysis revealed that high levels of NLR was an independent predictor of severe RMS (odds ratio =0.68, P=0.008). Moderate-to-severe RMS incidence was significantly higher among patients in the tertile 3 (odds ratio =2.8, P=0.001). NLR is a new inflammatory marker and a simple, rapid, and easily accessible prognostic parameter that can be associated with severity of RMS in patients with RHD. |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 33 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Other | 6 | 18% |
Student > Bachelor | 5 | 15% |
Researcher | 4 | 12% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 9% |
Student > Master | 3 | 9% |
Other | 8 | 24% |
Unknown | 4 | 12% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 21 | 64% |
Environmental Science | 1 | 3% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 3% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 3% |
Psychology | 1 | 3% |
Other | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 7 | 21% |