↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

A case study of asthma care in school age children using nurse-coordinated multidisciplinary collaborative practices

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare, April 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (65th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Readers on

mendeley
77 Mendeley
Title
A case study of asthma care in school age children using nurse-coordinated multidisciplinary collaborative practices
Published in
Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare, April 2015
DOI 10.2147/jmdh.s71030
Pubmed ID
Authors

Susan Procter, Fiona Brooks, Patricia Wilson, Carolyn Crouchman, Sally Kendall

Abstract

To describe the role of school nursing in leading and coordinating a multidisciplinary networked system of support for children with asthma, and to analyze the strengths and challenges of undertaking and supporting multiagency interprofessional practice. The growth of networked and interprofessional collaborations arises from the recognition that a number of the most pressing public health problems cannot be addressed by single-discipline or -agency interventions. This paper identifies the potential of school nursing to provide the vision and multiagency leadership required to coordinate multidisciplinary collaboration. A mixed-method single-case study design using Yin's approach, including focus groups, interviews, and analysis of policy documents and public health reports. A model that explains the integrated population approach to managing school-age asthma is described; the role of the lead school nurse coordinator was seen as critical to the development and sustainability of the model. School nurses can provide strategic multidisciplinary leadership to address pressing public health issues. Health service managers and commissioners need to understand how to support clinicians working across multiagency boundaries and to identify how to develop leadership skills for collaborative interprofessional practice so that the capacity for nursing and other health care professionals to address public health issues does not rely on individual motivation. In England, this will be of particular importance to the commissioning of public health services by local authorities from 2015.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 77 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 77 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 12 16%
Student > Postgraduate 7 9%
Student > Bachelor 7 9%
Researcher 6 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 8%
Other 22 29%
Unknown 17 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 14 18%
Medicine and Dentistry 14 18%
Social Sciences 7 9%
Business, Management and Accounting 5 6%
Unspecified 3 4%
Other 11 14%
Unknown 23 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 May 2018.
All research outputs
#7,697,099
of 23,577,654 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare
#306
of 861 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#90,992
of 265,997 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare
#4
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,654 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 861 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 265,997 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.