↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Patient preferences in severe COPD and asthma: a comprehensive literature review

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, April 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
17 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
31 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
90 Mendeley
Title
Patient preferences in severe COPD and asthma: a comprehensive literature review
Published in
International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, April 2015
DOI 10.2147/copd.s82179
Pubmed ID
Authors

Basil G Bereza, Anders Troelsgaard Nielsen, Sverrir Valgardsson, Michiel EH Hemels, Thomas R Einarson

Abstract

Management of chronic incurable diseases such as chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and asthma is difficult. Incorporation of patient preferences is widely encouraged. To summarize original research articles determining patient preference in moderate-to-severe disease. Acceptable articles consisted of original research determining preferences for any aspect of care in patients with COPD/asthma. The target population included those with severe disease; however, articles were accepted if they separated outcomes by severity or if the majority had at least moderate-to-severe disease. We also accepted simulation research based on scenarios describing situations involving moderate-to-severe disease that elicited preferences. Two reviewers searched Medline and Embase for articles published from the date of inception of the databases until the end of November 2014, with differences resolved through consensus discussion. Data were tabulated and analyzed descriptively. About 478 articles identified, 448 were rejected and 30 analyzed. There were 25 on COPD and five on asthma. Themes identified as most important in COPD were symptom relief (dyspnea/breathlessness), a positive patient-physician relationship, quality-of-life impairments, and information availability. Patients strongly preferred sponsors' inhalers. At end-of-life, 69% preferred receiving CPR, 70% wanted noninvasive, and 58% invasive mechanical intervention. While patients with asthma preferred treatments that increased symptom-free days, they were willing to trade days without symptoms for a reduction in adverse events and greater convenience. Asthma patients were willing to pay for waking up once and not needing their inhaler over waking up once overnight and needing their inhaler. Few studies have examined patient preference in these diseases. More research is needed to fill in knowledge gaps.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 90 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 90 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 19 21%
Other 10 11%
Researcher 10 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 11%
Student > Bachelor 9 10%
Other 13 14%
Unknown 19 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 36 40%
Nursing and Health Professions 11 12%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 4%
Social Sciences 4 4%
Psychology 4 4%
Other 11 12%
Unknown 20 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 April 2017.
All research outputs
#3,554,016
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
#437
of 2,577 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#44,369
of 279,170 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
#3
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,577 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 279,170 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.