↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Can a single session of motor imagery promote motor learning of locomotion in older adults? A randomized controlled trial

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Interventions in Aging, April 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (61st percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
21 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
172 Mendeley
Title
Can a single session of motor imagery promote motor learning of locomotion in older adults? A randomized controlled trial
Published in
Clinical Interventions in Aging, April 2018
DOI 10.2147/cia.s164401
Pubmed ID
Authors

Vaughan P Nicholson, Justin WL Keogh, Nancy L Low Choy

Abstract

To investigate the influence of a single session of locomotor-based motor imagery training on motor learning and physical performance. Thirty independent adults aged >65 years took part in the randomized controlled trial. The study was conducted within an exercise science laboratory. Participants were randomly divided into three groups following baseline locomotor testing: motor imagery training, physical training, and control groups. The motor imagery training group completed 20 imagined repetitions of a locomotor task, the physical training group completed 20 physical repetitions of a locomotor task, and the control group spent 25 minutes playing mentally stimulating games on an iPad. Imagined and physical performance times were measured for each training repetition. Gait speed (preferred and fast), timed-up-and-go, gait variability and the time to complete an obstacle course were completed before and after the single training session. Motor learning occurred in both the motor imagery training and physical training groups. Motor imagery training led to refinements in motor planning resulting in imagined movements better matching the physically performed movement at the end of training. Motor imagery and physical training also promoted improvements in some locomotion outcomes as demonstrated by medium to large effect size improvements after training for fast gait speed and timed-up-and-go. There were no training effects on gait variability. A single session of motor imagery training promoted motor learning of locomotion in independent older adults. Motor imagery training of a specific locomotor task also had a positive transfer effect on related physical locomotor performance outcomes.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 172 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 172 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 22 13%
Student > Bachelor 21 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 13 8%
Researcher 13 8%
Other 20 12%
Unknown 64 37%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 25 15%
Medicine and Dentistry 20 12%
Neuroscience 16 9%
Sports and Recreations 15 9%
Psychology 5 3%
Other 16 9%
Unknown 75 44%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 February 2021.
All research outputs
#7,963,683
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Interventions in Aging
#750
of 1,968 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#129,715
of 343,807 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Interventions in Aging
#27
of 50 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,968 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 343,807 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 50 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.