↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Fascial preadipocytes: another missing piece of the puzzle to understand fibromyalgia?

Overview of attention for article published in Open Access Rheumatology : Research and Reviews , May 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#22 of 192)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
16 X users
facebook
4 Facebook pages

Readers on

mendeley
53 Mendeley
Title
Fascial preadipocytes: another missing piece of the puzzle to understand fibromyalgia?
Published in
Open Access Rheumatology : Research and Reviews , May 2018
DOI 10.2147/oarrr.s155919
Pubmed ID
Authors

Bruno Bordoni, Fabiola Marelli, Bruno Morabito, Francesca Cavallaro, David Lintonbon

Abstract

Fibromyalgia (FM) syndrome is a chronic condition causing pain, affecting approximately 0.5%-6% of the developed countries' population, and on average, 2% of the worldwide population. Despite the large amount of scientific literature available, the FM etiology is still uncertain. The diagnosis is based on the clinical presentation and the severity of the symptomatology. Several studies pointed out pathological alterations within the central nervous system, suggesting that FM could originate from a central sensitization of the pain processing centers. Research supports the thesis of a peripheral neuropathic component, with the finding of axonal damages. The fibromyalgia patient has many myofascial system abnormalities, such as pain and fatigue, impairing the symptomatic profile. This paper revises the myopathic compensations, highlighting the possible role of the fascia in generating symptoms, being aware of the new information about the fascia's activity in stimulating inflammation and fat cell production.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 53 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 53 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 11 21%
Other 5 9%
Researcher 5 9%
Lecturer 3 6%
Student > Bachelor 3 6%
Other 7 13%
Unknown 19 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 11 21%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 15%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 6%
Neuroscience 2 4%
Sports and Recreations 2 4%
Other 6 11%
Unknown 21 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 August 2019.
All research outputs
#2,734,217
of 25,593,129 outputs
Outputs from Open Access Rheumatology : Research and Reviews
#22
of 192 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#54,384
of 339,739 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Open Access Rheumatology : Research and Reviews
#1
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,593,129 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 192 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 339,739 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them