↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

The feasibility of using electronic clinical outcome assessments in people with schizophrenia and their informal caregivers

Overview of attention for article published in Patient related outcome measures, March 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
25 Mendeley
Title
The feasibility of using electronic clinical outcome assessments in people with schizophrenia and their informal caregivers
Published in
Patient related outcome measures, March 2015
DOI 10.2147/prom.s79348
Pubmed ID
Authors

Chloe Tolley, Diana Rofail, Adam Gater, Justine K Lalonde

Abstract

Many clinical outcome assessments (COAs) were originally developed for completion via pen and paper. However, in recent years there have been movements toward electronic capture of such data in an effort to reduce missing data, provide time-stamped records, minimize administrative burden, and avoid secondary data entry errors. Although established in many patient populations, the implications of using electronic COAs in schizophrenia are unknown. In accordance with International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research (ISPOR) Task Force recommendations, in-depth cognitive debriefing and usability interviews were conducted with people with schizophrenia (n=12), their informal (unpaid) caregivers (n=12), and research support staff (n=6) to assess the suitability of administration of various electronic COA measures using an electronic tablet device. Minimal issues were encountered by participants when completing or administering the COAs in electronic format, with many finding it easier to complete instruments in this mode than by pen and paper. The majority of issues reported were specific to the device functionality rather than the electronic mode of administration. Findings support data collection via electronic tablet in people with schizophrenia and their caregivers. The appropriateness of other forms of electronic data capture (eg, smartphones, interactive voice response systems, etc) is a topic for future investigation.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 25 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 25 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 7 28%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 16%
Other 3 12%
Student > Master 3 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 4%
Other 4 16%
Unknown 3 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 6 24%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 20%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 8%
Social Sciences 2 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 4%
Other 4 16%
Unknown 5 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 April 2015.
All research outputs
#22,759,802
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Patient related outcome measures
#183
of 196 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#232,494
of 270,996 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Patient related outcome measures
#5
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 196 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 270,996 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.