↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Profile of atacicept and its potential in the treatment of systemic lupus erythematosus

Overview of attention for article published in Drug Design, Development and Therapy, March 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
patent
1 patent
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
36 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
65 Mendeley
Title
Profile of atacicept and its potential in the treatment of systemic lupus erythematosus
Published in
Drug Design, Development and Therapy, March 2015
DOI 10.2147/dddt.s71276
Pubmed ID
Authors

Estafania Cogollo, Marta Amaral Silva, David Isenberg

Abstract

The importance of B cell activating factors in the generation of autoantibodies in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is now recognized. The two key factors, known as BAFF and APRIL, produced by a variety of cells including monocytes, dendritic cells and T cells, also help to regulate B cell maturation, function and survival. Biologic agents that block these factors have now been developed and tried out in large scale clinical trials in SLE patients. Benlysta which blocks BAFF has met some of its end points in clinical trials and is approved for use in patients with skin and joint disease who have failed conventional drugs. In contrast, clinical trials using atacicept which blocks both BAFF and APRIL have been more challenging to interpret. An early study in lupus nephritis was, mistakenly, abandoned due to serious infections thought to be linked to the biologic when in fact the dramatic fall in the immunoglobulin levels took place when the patients were given mycophenolate, prior to the introduction of the atacicept. Likewise the higher dose arm (150 mgm) of a flare prevention study was terminated prematurely when 2 deaths occurred. However, the mortality rate in this study was identical to that seen in the Benlysta studies and a post hoc analysis found a highly significant benefit for the 150mgm arm compared to the lower dose (75 mgm) and placebo arms. Other trials with both Benlysta and atacicept are on-going.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 65 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Belgium 1 2%
Unknown 64 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 12 18%
Other 9 14%
Student > Bachelor 9 14%
Student > Master 8 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 9%
Other 17 26%
Unknown 4 6%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 28 43%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 7 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 5%
Other 8 12%
Unknown 9 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 April 2023.
All research outputs
#4,159,040
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Drug Design, Development and Therapy
#260
of 2,268 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#48,260
of 270,996 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Drug Design, Development and Therapy
#14
of 70 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,268 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 270,996 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 70 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.