↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Methods to improve joint attention in young children with autism: a review

Overview of attention for article published in Pediatric Health, Medicine and Therapeutics, May 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
66 Mendeley
Title
Methods to improve joint attention in young children with autism: a review
Published in
Pediatric Health, Medicine and Therapeutics, May 2015
DOI 10.2147/phmt.s41921
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tanya Paparella, Stephanny F N Freeman

Abstract

We provide an overview of studies in the past 10 years (2004-2014) that have aimed to improve joint attention (JA) in young children at risk for, or with, autism spectrum disorder. Thirteen randomized controlled trial (RCT) interventions were found, which received particular focus. Three studies used intervention methods with a developmental orientation and focused on caregiver-mediated methods. Others used combined developmental and behavioral approaches and delivered intervention via trained interventionists, caregivers, and teachers. Interventions ranged widely in density, both with respect to the amount of intervention delivered weekly and the total duration of intervention. Fourteen single-subject research design (SSRD) studies and one quasi-experimental pre-post design study were also included. Notably absent in the RCTs were studies using only behavioral methods, while behavioral methods dominated in the SSRDs. The outcomes of the RCTs using combined behavioral and developmental methods generally demonstrate short-term social communication gains. While some studies demonstrated long-term maintenance and positive outcomes in related areas such as language, many did not. The mixed results for language outcomes indicate a need for further investigation. In addition, future studies should further examine participants' developmental readiness and intervention dose in relation to outcome, as well as aim to isolate active ingredients of interventions.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 66 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 66 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 17 26%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 17%
Student > Bachelor 10 15%
Researcher 2 3%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 3%
Other 2 3%
Unknown 22 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 15 23%
Social Sciences 4 6%
Linguistics 3 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 5%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 5%
Other 13 20%
Unknown 25 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 May 2015.
All research outputs
#20,823,121
of 25,582,611 outputs
Outputs from Pediatric Health, Medicine and Therapeutics
#112
of 157 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#206,969
of 279,338 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Pediatric Health, Medicine and Therapeutics
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,582,611 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 157 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.8. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 279,338 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.