↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Challenging issues in assessing analytical similarity in biosimilar studies

Overview of attention for article published in Biosimilars, May 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Readers on

mendeley
70 Mendeley
Title
Challenging issues in assessing analytical similarity in biosimilar studies
Published in
Biosimilars, May 2015
DOI 10.2147/bs.s84141
Authors

Shein-Chung Chow

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 70 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 1%
Unknown 69 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 7 10%
Other 5 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 7%
Student > Bachelor 2 3%
Student > Master 2 3%
Other 1 1%
Unknown 48 69%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 9%
Chemistry 5 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 4%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 49 70%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 May 2015.
All research outputs
#16,721,208
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Biosimilars
#14
of 29 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#159,715
of 278,920 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biosimilars
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 29 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.8. This one scored the same or higher as 15 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 278,920 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them