↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

The incidence and risk factors of peripherally inserted central catheter-related infection among cancer patients

Overview of attention for article published in Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management, May 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (52nd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (54th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
38 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
77 Mendeley
Title
The incidence and risk factors of peripherally inserted central catheter-related infection among cancer patients
Published in
Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management, May 2015
DOI 10.2147/tcrm.s83776
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yufang Gao, Yuxiu Liu, Xiaoyan Ma, Lili Wei, Weifen Chen, Lei Song

Abstract

As the use of peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs) increased in chemotherapy, the identification of complications and risk factors became essential to prevent patient harm. But little is known about PICC-related infection and risk factors among patients with cancer. Our study was to identify the prevalence, patterns, and risk factors of catheter-related infections associated with PICCs. A 3-year prospective cohort study was conducted in a university-affiliated hospital. All patients with cancer who met inclusion criteria were enrolled. The patients were followed up until catheter removal. Tip cultures were routinely performed at the time of catheter removal. The general information was recorded at the time of PICC insertion, weekly care, and removal. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses were applied for identification of risk factors. In total, 912 cancer patients with 912 PICCs of 96,307 catheter days were enrolled. Ninety-four developed PICC-related infection; 46 were exit-site infection, 43 were catheter bacterial colonization, and five were PICC-related bloodstream infection. The median time from catheter insertion to infection was 98.26 days. Multivariate analysis showed StatLock fixing (odds ratio [OR] =0.555, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.326-0.945) and tip position located in the lower one-third of the superior vena cava (OR =0.340, 95% CI: 0.202-0.571) were associated with lower PICC infection rate. Catheter care delay (OR =2.612, 95% CI: 1.373-4.969) and indwelling mostly in summer (OR =4.784, 95% CI: 2.681-8.538) were associated with higher infection incidence. StatLock fixing and tip position located in the lower one-third of the superior vena cava were protective factors against PICC-related infection, while catheter care delay and indwelling mostly in summer were risk factors. Policy and measures targeting these factors may be necessary to reduce the risk of infection.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 77 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Ecuador 1 1%
Unknown 76 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 10 13%
Student > Bachelor 10 13%
Student > Master 9 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 10%
Student > Postgraduate 6 8%
Other 16 21%
Unknown 18 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 30 39%
Nursing and Health Professions 14 18%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 3%
Social Sciences 2 3%
Other 5 6%
Unknown 19 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 June 2016.
All research outputs
#14,600,874
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management
#611
of 1,323 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#130,856
of 278,918 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management
#18
of 42 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,323 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 278,918 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 42 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.