↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Olanzapine–valproate combination versus olanzapine or valproate monotherapy in the treatment of bipolar I mania: a randomized controlled study in a Chinese population group

Overview of attention for article published in Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment, May 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (54th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
34 Mendeley
Title
Olanzapine–valproate combination versus olanzapine or valproate monotherapy in the treatment of bipolar I mania: a randomized controlled study in a Chinese population group
Published in
Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment, May 2015
DOI 10.2147/ndt.s81146
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lei Xu, Yunrong Lu, Ying Yang, Yanping Zheng, Fang Chen, Zheng Lin

Abstract

Bipolar disorder (BP) is a mental illness that has a high social burden estimated by disability-adjusted life years. In the present study, we investigated the efficacy of olanzapine-valproate combination therapy versus olanzapine or valproate monotherapy in the treatment of bipolar I mania in a Chinese population group. Patients aged 19-58 years who had had an acute manic episode of BP were enrolled in the present study and randomly assigned to receive 600 mg sodium valproate daily (group A), 10 mg olanzapine daily (group B), or a combination of 600 mg olanzapine and 10 mg sodium valproate daily (group C) for 4 weeks. The primary outcome was reduction in Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS) scores. The secondary outcome was assessed with the Clinical Global Impression - Bipolar (CGI-BP) scale. Adverse reactions, such as weight gain, sleepy, and dizziness were also evaluated. Statistical analysis was carried out on a per-protocol basis. Patients in groups B and C showed significant improvement in YMRS scores compared with those in group A (P<0.01) during weeks 1-4 of treatment. Patients in group C showed significant improvement in YMRS scores compared with those in group B (P<0.01) only after 4 weeks of treatment. Furthermore, after 3-4 weeks of treatment, patients in groups B and C showed significantly greater improvement in CGI-BP scale scores compared with group A (P<0.05), while Group C demonstrated significantly greater improvement in CGI-BP scale scores than group B (P<0.01). No significant difference existed in extrapyramidal reactions among these groups. Adverse reactions, including weight gain, drowsiness, dizziness, and constipation, were stronger in groups B and C than in group A (P<0.05). The combination therapy with olanzapine and sodium valproate had higher efficacy than monotherapy in patients with bipolar mania, which provides a crucial insight of the treatment regimen during clinical practice.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 34 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 34 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 5 15%
Student > Postgraduate 4 12%
Student > Bachelor 3 9%
Researcher 3 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 6%
Other 6 18%
Unknown 11 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 5 15%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 15%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 12%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 3%
Other 4 12%
Unknown 12 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 June 2015.
All research outputs
#14,278,028
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment
#1,254
of 3,132 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#127,014
of 278,920 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment
#38
of 72 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,132 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 278,920 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 72 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.