↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Pre-exposure prophylaxis for sexually-acquired HIV risk management: a review

Overview of attention for article published in HIV/AIDS (Auckland, N.Z.), April 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#17 of 330)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
2 policy sources
twitter
6 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
47 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
111 Mendeley
Title
Pre-exposure prophylaxis for sexually-acquired HIV risk management: a review
Published in
HIV/AIDS (Auckland, N.Z.), April 2015
DOI 10.2147/hiv.s50025
Pubmed ID
Authors

James Wilton, Heather Senn, Malika Sharma, Darrell HS Tan

Abstract

Despite significant efforts, the rate of new HIV infections worldwide remains unacceptably high, highlighting the need for new HIV prevention strategies. HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) is a new approach that involves the ongoing use of antiretroviral medications by HIV-negative individuals to reduce the risk of HIV infection. The use of daily tenofovir/emtricitabine as oral PrEP was found to be effective in multiple placebo-controlled clinical trials and approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration. In addition, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention in the United States and the World Health Organization have both released guidelines recommending the offer of oral PrEP to high-risk populations. The scale-up of PrEP is underway, but several implementation questions remain unanswered. Demonstration projects and open-label extensions of placebo-controlled trials are ongoing and hope to contribute to our understanding of PrEP use and delivery outside the randomized controlled trial setting. Evidence is beginning to emerge from these open-label studies and will be critical for guiding PrEP scale-up. Outside of such studies, PrEP uptake has been slow and several client- and provider-related barriers are limiting uptake. Maximizing the public health impact of PrEP will require rollout to be combined with interventions to promote uptake, support adherence, and prevent increases in risk behavior. Additional PrEP strategies are currently under investigation in placebo-controlled clinical trials and may be available in the future.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 111 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 110 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 28 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 14%
Researcher 13 12%
Student > Bachelor 10 9%
Student > Postgraduate 8 7%
Other 13 12%
Unknown 24 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 33 30%
Social Sciences 14 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 12 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 5%
Psychology 5 5%
Other 16 14%
Unknown 26 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 March 2022.
All research outputs
#2,614,716
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from HIV/AIDS (Auckland, N.Z.)
#17
of 330 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,865
of 279,170 outputs
Outputs of similar age from HIV/AIDS (Auckland, N.Z.)
#2
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 330 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 279,170 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.