| Title |
The association between combined non-cystic fibrosis bronchiectasis and lung cancer in patients with chronic obstructive lung disease
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, May 2015
|
| DOI | 10.2147/copd.s80439 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Yeon Wook Kim, Kwang-Nam Jin, Eun Young Heo, Sung Soo Park, Hee Soon Chung, Deog Kyeom Kim |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 33 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 33 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 7 | 21% |
| Researcher | 4 | 12% |
| Other | 2 | 6% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 6% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 6 | 18% |
| Unknown | 10 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 11 | 33% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 3 | 9% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 6% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 3% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 4 | 12% |
| Unknown | 11 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 December 2018.
All research outputs
#3,415,350
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
#415
of 2,577 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#42,404
of 278,920 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
#5
of 52 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,577 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 278,920 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 52 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.