↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Reduction in laboratory turnaround time decreases emergency room length of stay

Overview of attention for article published in Open access emergency medicine OAEM, April 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
31 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
87 Mendeley
Title
Reduction in laboratory turnaround time decreases emergency room length of stay
Published in
Open access emergency medicine OAEM, April 2018
DOI 10.2147/oaem.s155988
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nitin Kaushik, Victor S Khangulov, Matthew O’Hara, Ramy Arnaout

Abstract

Laboratory tests are an important contributor to treatment decisions in the emergency department (ED). Rapid turnaround of laboratory tests can optimize ED throughout by reducing the length of stay (LOS) and improving patient outcomes. Despite evidence supporting the effect of shorter turnaround time (TAT) on LOS and outcomes, there is still a lack of large retrospective studies examining these associations. Here, we evaluated the effect of a reduction in laboratory TAT on ED LOS using retrospective analysis of Electronic Health Records (EHR). Retrospective analysis of ED encounters from a large, US-based, de-identified EHR database and a separate analysis of ED encounters from the EHR of an ED at a top-tier tertiary care center were performed. Additionally, an efficiency model calculating the cumulative potential LOS time savings and resulting financial opportunity due to laboratory TAT reduction was created, assuming other factors affecting LOS are constant. Multivariate regression analysis of patients from the multisite study showed that a 1-minute decrease in laboratory TAT was associated with 0.50 minutes of decrease in LOS. The single-site analysis confirmed our findings from the multisite analysis that a positive correlation between laboratory TAT and ED LOS exists in the ED population as a whole, as well as across different patient acuity levels. In addition, based on the calculations from the efficiency model, for a 5-, 10- and 15-minute TAT reduction, the single-site ED can potentially admit a total of 127, 256 and 386 additional patients, respectively, annually. A positive correlation between laboratory TAT and ED LOS was observed in a broad patient population and across distinct acuity levels.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 87 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 87 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 16 18%
Student > Postgraduate 8 9%
Student > Bachelor 8 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 5%
Professor 3 3%
Other 13 15%
Unknown 35 40%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 18 21%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 8%
Business, Management and Accounting 5 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 3%
Other 12 14%
Unknown 38 44%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 March 2020.
All research outputs
#14,631,258
of 25,523,622 outputs
Outputs from Open access emergency medicine OAEM
#104
of 231 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#170,589
of 344,158 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Open access emergency medicine OAEM
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,523,622 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 231 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 344,158 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.