↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Article Metrics

Steroid for epidural injection in spinal stenosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Overview of attention for article published in Drug Design, Development and Therapy, January 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (57th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
22 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
71 Mendeley
Title
Steroid for epidural injection in spinal stenosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Published in
Drug Design, Development and Therapy, January 2015
DOI 10.2147/dddt.s78070
Pubmed ID
Authors

Xing Wu, Kuan Liu, Peng-Cheng Liu, Run Liu, Ming Cai

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 71 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 71 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 13 18%
Other 10 14%
Student > Master 8 11%
Student > Postgraduate 7 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 8%
Other 17 24%
Unknown 10 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 44 62%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 6%
Unspecified 2 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 3%
Psychology 1 1%
Other 4 6%
Unknown 14 20%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 February 2021.
All research outputs
#9,568,337
of 17,356,510 outputs
Outputs from Drug Design, Development and Therapy
#468
of 1,715 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#100,716
of 241,499 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Drug Design, Development and Therapy
#23
of 92 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,356,510 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,715 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 241,499 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 92 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.