↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

The impact of total sleep deprivation upon cognitive functioning in firefighters

Overview of attention for article published in Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment, May 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
8 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
19 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
42 Mendeley
Title
The impact of total sleep deprivation upon cognitive functioning in firefighters
Published in
Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment, May 2018
DOI 10.2147/ndt.s156501
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sławomir Kujawski, Joanna Słomko, Małgorzata Tafil-Klawe, Monika Zawadka-Kunikowska, Justyna Szrajda, Julia L Newton, Paweł Zalewski, Jacek J Klawe

Abstract

Firefighters as a profession are required to maintain high levels of attention for prolonged periods. However, total sleep deprivation (TSD) could influence negatively upon performance, particularly when the task is prolonged and repetitive. The aim of this study is to examine the influence of TSD on cognitive functioning in a group of firefighters. Sixty volunteers who were active male fire brigade officers were examined with a computerized battery test that consisted of simple reaction time (SRT) (repeated three times), choice reaction time, visual attention test, and delayed matching to sample. Six series of measurements were undertaken over a period of TSD. Performance in the second attempt in SRT test was significantly worse in terms of increased number of errors and, consequently, decreased number of correct responses during TSD. In contrast, the choice reaction time number of correct responses as well as the visual attention test reaction time for all and correct responses significantly improved compared to initial time points. The study has confirmed that subjects committed significantly more errors and, consequently, noted a smaller number of correct responses in the second attempt of SRT test. However, the remaining results showed reversed direction of TSD influence. TSD potentially leads to worse performance in a relatively easy task in a group of firefighters. Errors during repetitive tasks in firefighting routines could potentially translate into catastrophic consequences.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 42 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 42 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 6 14%
Student > Bachelor 5 12%
Researcher 4 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 5%
Other 9 21%
Unknown 12 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 5 12%
Psychology 4 10%
Neuroscience 4 10%
Social Sciences 3 7%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 5%
Other 12 29%
Unknown 12 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 May 2018.
All research outputs
#6,267,478
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment
#789
of 3,131 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#100,087
of 339,234 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment
#20
of 80 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,131 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 339,234 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 80 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.