↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Assessing the costs and benefits of perioperative iron deficiency anemia management with ferric carboxymaltose in Germany

Overview of attention for article published in Risk Management and Healthcare Policy, April 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
2 policy sources
twitter
7 X users
patent
2 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
35 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
60 Mendeley
Title
Assessing the costs and benefits of perioperative iron deficiency anemia management with ferric carboxymaltose in Germany
Published in
Risk Management and Healthcare Policy, April 2018
DOI 10.2147/rmhp.s157379
Pubmed ID
Authors

Bernd Froessler, Alexandra M Rueger, Mark P Connolly

Abstract

Perioperative administration of ferric carboxymaltose (FCM) was previously shown to reduce both the need for transfusions and the hospital length of stay in patients with preoperative iron deficiency anemia (IDA). In this study, we estimated the economic consequences of perioperative administration using FCM vs usual care in patients with IDA from the perspective of a German hospital using decision-analytic modeling. The model was populated with clinical inputs (transfusion rates, blood units transfused, hospital length of stay) from a previously reported randomized trial comparing FCM vs usual care for managing IDA patients undergoing elective abdominal surgery. We applied a hospital perspective to all costs, excluding surgery-related costs in both treatment arms. One-way sensitivity analyses were undertaken to evaluate key drivers of cost analysis. The average costs per case treated using FCM compared to usual care were €2,461 and €3,246, respectively, for resource expenses paid by hospital per case. This would suggest potential savings achieved with preoperative intravenous iron treatment per patient of €786 per case. A sensitivity analysis varying the key input parameters indicated the cost analysis is most sensitive to changes in the length of stay and the cost of hospitalization per day. Perioperative administration of FCM results in cost savings to hospitals based on reduced blood transfusions and length of stay following elective abdominal surgery.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 60 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 60 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 6 10%
Unspecified 5 8%
Student > Master 5 8%
Lecturer 4 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 7%
Other 18 30%
Unknown 18 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 21 35%
Unspecified 5 8%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 5%
Engineering 2 3%
Other 5 8%
Unknown 19 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 November 2023.
All research outputs
#2,193,331
of 22,986,950 outputs
Outputs from Risk Management and Healthcare Policy
#63
of 622 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#49,702
of 330,025 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Risk Management and Healthcare Policy
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,986,950 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 622 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 330,025 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them