↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Usability of a new disposable autoinjector platform device: results of a formative study conducted with a broad user population

Overview of attention for article published in Medical Devices : Evidence and Research, June 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#33 of 314)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
1 X user
patent
2 patents
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
19 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
30 Mendeley
Title
Usability of a new disposable autoinjector platform device: results of a formative study conducted with a broad user population
Published in
Medical Devices : Evidence and Research, June 2015
DOI 10.2147/mder.s85938
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jakob Lange, Philipp Richard, Nick Bradley

Abstract

This article presents a late-stage formative usability study of an autoinjector platform device. Such devices are used for the subcutaneous delivery of biopharmaceuticals, primarily for self-administration by the patient. Previous usability work on autoinjectors reported in the literature has been specific to single indications. This study was instead conducted with a broad user population, defined to represent user characteristics across a range of indications. The goals of the study were to evaluate whether users could use the devices safely and effectively, and could understand the instructions for use (IFU) as well as the accompanying training. Further objectives were to capture any usability issues and to obtain participants' subjective ratings on the IFU and training as well as the confidence and comfort in using the device. A total of 43 participants in 5 groups received training and performed simulated injections either into an injection pad or a mannequin. All participants were able to successfully use the device. The device was well appreciated by all users, with a reported degree of confidence in using the device of 98%, of user comfort of 93%, and of comprehensibility of IFU and training of 98%. These values are higher than other comparable results reported in the literature. The presence of both audible and visible feedback during injection was seen to be a significant factor contributing to injection success. The observation that the device can be safely and efficiently used by all tested user groups provides confidence that the device and IFU in their current form will pass future summative testing in specific applications.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 30 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 3%
Unknown 29 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 6 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 17%
Researcher 5 17%
Student > Master 5 17%
Student > Postgraduate 2 7%
Other 5 17%
Unknown 2 7%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 8 27%
Engineering 6 20%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 17%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 7%
Chemistry 2 7%
Other 4 13%
Unknown 3 10%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 November 2023.
All research outputs
#2,586,511
of 25,457,858 outputs
Outputs from Medical Devices : Evidence and Research
#33
of 314 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,239
of 281,589 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Medical Devices : Evidence and Research
#2
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,858 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 314 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 281,589 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.