↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Identification of Mycobacterium tuberculosis BioA inhibitors by using structure-based virtual screening

Overview of attention for article published in Drug Design, Development and Therapy, May 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (62nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
17 Mendeley
Title
Identification of Mycobacterium tuberculosis BioA inhibitors by using structure-based virtual screening
Published in
Drug Design, Development and Therapy, May 2018
DOI 10.2147/dddt.s144240
Pubmed ID
Authors

Swati Singh, Garima Khare, Ritika Kar Bahal, Prahlad C Ghosh, Anil K Tyagi

Abstract

7,8-Diaminopelargonic acid synthase (BioA), an enzyme of biotin biosynthesis pathway, is a well-known promising target for anti-tubercular drug development. In this study, structure-based virtual screening was employed against the active site of BioA to identify new chemical entities for BioA inhibition and top ranking compounds were evaluated for their ability to inhibit BioA enzymatic activity. Seven compounds inhibited BioA enzymatic activity by greater than 60% at 100 μg/mL with most potent compounds being A36, A35 and A65, displaying IC50 values of 10.48 μg/mL (28.94 μM), 33.36 μg/mL (88.16 μM) and 39.17 μg/mL (114.42 μM), respectively. Compounds A65 and A35 inhibited Mycobacterium tuberculosis (M. tuberculosis) growth with MIC90 of 20 μg/mL and 80 μg/mL, respectively, whereas compound A36 exhibited relatively weak inhibition of M. tuberculosis growth (83% inhibition at 200 μg/mL). Compound A65 emerged as the most potent compound identified in our study that inhibited BioA enzymatic activity and growth of the pathogen and possessed drug-like properties. Our study has identified a few hit molecules against M. tuberculosis BioA that can act as potential candidates for further development of potent anti-tubercular therapeutic agents.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 17 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 2 12%
Lecturer 2 12%
Student > Bachelor 2 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 6%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 6%
Other 2 12%
Unknown 7 41%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 18%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 18%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 12%
Arts and Humanities 1 6%
Unknown 8 47%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 May 2018.
All research outputs
#16,149,689
of 25,523,622 outputs
Outputs from Drug Design, Development and Therapy
#930
of 2,273 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#196,699
of 339,560 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Drug Design, Development and Therapy
#21
of 59 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,523,622 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,273 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 339,560 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 59 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.