Title |
Office and ambulatory blood pressure control with a fixed-dose combination of candesartan and hydrochlorothiazide in previously uncontrolled hypertensive patients: results of CHILI CU Soon
|
---|---|
Published in |
Vascular Health and Risk Management, December 2011
|
DOI | 10.2147/vhrm.s26887 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Peter Bramlage, Mengden, Hübner |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 17 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 24% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 12% |
Student > Bachelor | 2 | 12% |
Other | 1 | 6% |
Unspecified | 1 | 6% |
Other | 3 | 18% |
Unknown | 4 | 24% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 47% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 12% |
Unspecified | 1 | 6% |
Neuroscience | 1 | 6% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 6% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 4 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 August 2019.
All research outputs
#3,319,745
of 23,051,185 outputs
Outputs from Vascular Health and Risk Management
#105
of 761 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,775
of 241,831 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Vascular Health and Risk Management
#3
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,051,185 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 761 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 241,831 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 7 of them.