↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Clinical analysis of 50 Eastern Asian patients with primary pulmonary large-cell neuroendocrine carcinoma

Overview of attention for article published in OncoTargets and therapy, May 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
10 Mendeley
Title
Clinical analysis of 50 Eastern Asian patients with primary pulmonary large-cell neuroendocrine carcinoma
Published in
OncoTargets and therapy, May 2015
DOI 10.2147/ott.s83347
Pubmed ID
Authors

Xin-ke Zhang, Tao Qin, Yin-duo Zeng, Yuan-yuan Zhao, Xue Hou, Wen-feng Fang, Shao-dong Hong, Ting Zhou, Zhi-huang Hu, Yun-peng Yang, Yu-xiang Ma, Cong Xue, Yan Huang, Hong-yun Zhao, Li Zhang

Abstract

To understand the clinicopathological features of patients with primary pulmonary large-cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNEC), including the frequency of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation, and to explore prognostic factors. We investigated a cohort of 50 individuals from our center database who were diagnosed with operable pulmonary LCNEC and treated in Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center. Serum albumin (ALB) and neuron-specific enolase (NSE) were also collected. Survival curves were obtained with the Kaplan-Meier method, and the differences between groups in survival were tested by the log-rank test. The median age was 59 years (range, 40-80 years). Fourteen patients underwent mutational analysis of EGFR; of these, 12 had wild-type EGFR and the remaining two had EGFR mutations in exons. The median disease-free survival (DFS) of pulmonary LCNEC was 49.3 months and that of overall survival (OS) was not reached. DFS and OS were shorter for patients with decreased serum ALB than for patients with normal serum ALB (P=0.003 and P=0.004, respectively). Meanwhile, a high level of NSE was also significantly associated with short DFS and OS (P=0.005 and P=0.000, respectively). Multivariate analysis showed that decrease in serum ALB was an independent prognostic factor for OS (P=0.046). The frequency of EGFR mutation in LCNEC patients is low. Serum ALB and NSE levels are valuable prognostic factors for LCNEC patients.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 10 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 3 30%
Other 2 20%
Student > Postgraduate 2 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 10%
Student > Bachelor 1 10%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 1 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 9 90%
Unknown 1 10%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 May 2015.
All research outputs
#22,758,309
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from OncoTargets and therapy
#2,078
of 3,016 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#239,358
of 278,911 outputs
Outputs of similar age from OncoTargets and therapy
#34
of 49 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,016 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.9. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 278,911 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 49 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.