↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Bladder cancer in the elderly patient: challenges and solutions

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Interventions in Aging, June 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (51st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (65th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
56 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
98 Mendeley
Title
Bladder cancer in the elderly patient: challenges and solutions
Published in
Clinical Interventions in Aging, June 2015
DOI 10.2147/cia.s74322
Pubmed ID
Authors

Elizabeth A Guancial, Breton Roussel, Derek P Bergsma, Kevin C Bylund, Deepak Sahasrabudhe, Edward Messing, Supriya G Mohile, Chunkit Fung

Abstract

Bladder cancer (BC) is an age-associated malignancy with increased prevalence in the elderly population. Elderly patients are a vulnerable population at increased risk for treatment-related toxicity secondary to medical comorbidities and geriatric syndromes. As a result, this population has been historically undertreated and suffers worse disease-specific outcomes than younger patients with BC. Recognition of this disparity has led to efforts to individualize treatment decisions based on functional status rather than chronologic age in an effort to optimize the use of curative therapies for the fit elderly and modify treatments to reduce the risk of toxicity and disease-related morbidity in vulnerable or frail patients. The comprehensive geriatric assessment is a decision framework that helps to balance underlying health considerations and risks of therapy with aggressiveness of the cancer. Development of systemic therapies with increased efficacy against BC and reduced toxicity are eagerly awaited, as are techniques and interventions to reduce the morbidity from surgery and radiation for patients with BC.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 98 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 1%
Denmark 1 1%
Unknown 96 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 14 14%
Student > Master 14 14%
Other 11 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 10%
Student > Postgraduate 9 9%
Other 19 19%
Unknown 21 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 52 53%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 8%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 4 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 2%
Social Sciences 2 2%
Other 6 6%
Unknown 24 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 February 2024.
All research outputs
#15,048,620
of 25,584,565 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Interventions in Aging
#966
of 1,962 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#134,395
of 281,752 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Interventions in Aging
#15
of 43 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,584,565 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,962 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.2. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 281,752 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 43 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.