↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Fetal mummification in the major domestic species: current perspectives on causes and management

Overview of attention for article published in Veterinary Medicine : Research and Reports, June 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
26 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
71 Mendeley
Title
Fetal mummification in the major domestic species: current perspectives on causes and management
Published in
Veterinary Medicine : Research and Reports, June 2015
DOI 10.2147/vmrr.s59520
Pubmed ID
Authors

Réjean C Lefebvre

Abstract

Fetal mummification is an uncommon condition in most domestic species. While most often seen in multiparous and polytocous species like swine, it is also observed in monotocous species when the fetus is retained for a long time. The low prevalence of the condition may help explain the scarcity of information in the literature. To further complicate the study of this phenomenon, the physiological mechanisms that maintain pregnancy vary between species, implying different pathways for the condition. The exact outcome of early fetal mortality is unpredictable, and is influenced by several factors, including the cause of fetal mortality, differences in pregnancy between species, stage of gestation at fetal death, and number of fetuses. Based on our current knowledge of natural fetal mummification events, there are a number of prerequisites for the process of fetal mummification to occur. Examining the circumstances associated with fetal mummification can help scientists better understand the etiology and clinical situation in different species. The objective of this article is to review fetal mummification in the major domestic species: cattle, goats, sheep, horses, swine, dogs, and cats. This paper discusses the clinical situation, the most common and important etiologies, and the treatment approaches for restoring future pregnancy in the female, and where applicable, herd fertility.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 71 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Malaysia 1 1%
Unknown 70 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 13 18%
Student > Master 12 17%
Student > Postgraduate 8 11%
Researcher 5 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 6%
Other 5 7%
Unknown 24 34%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 27 38%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 3%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 1%
Other 1 1%
Unknown 24 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 June 2016.
All research outputs
#15,323,597
of 25,611,630 outputs
Outputs from Veterinary Medicine : Research and Reports
#52
of 136 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#138,285
of 281,879 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Veterinary Medicine : Research and Reports
#7
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,611,630 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 136 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 23.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 281,879 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.