↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Comparison of safety and outcomes of shock wave lithotripsy between elderly and non-elderly patients

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Interventions in Aging, April 2017
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
19 Mendeley
Title
Comparison of safety and outcomes of shock wave lithotripsy between elderly and non-elderly patients
Published in
Clinical Interventions in Aging, April 2017
DOI 10.2147/cia.s134750
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yi-Zhong Chen, Wun-Rong Lin, Chih-Chiao Lee, Fang-Ju Sun, Yung-Chiong Chow, Wei-Kung Tsai, Pai-Kai Chiang, Ting-Po Lin, Marcelo Chen, Allen W Chiu

Abstract

This study compared the clinical outcomes of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy between elderly (aged $65 years) and non-elderly (aged <65 years) patients. A retrospective review of medical records was performed on 483 (non-elderly: 245, elderly: 238) patients with upper urinary tract stones who underwent shock wave lithotripsy between 2007 and 2015. The demographic data, stone parameters, stone-free rate, retreatment rate, and complication rate were analyzed in both elderly and non-elderly patient groups. There was no significant difference between non-elderly and elderly patients in terms of stone-free rate (46.5% vs 41.1%, P>0.05) regardless of stone site or stone size and overall retreatment rate (41.6% vs 37.0%, P>0.05). Elderly patients had a higher complication rate than non-elderly patients (15.5% vs 23.5%, P=0.026). The most common complication was flank pain. Receiver operating characteristic curves predicted that elderly patients (cutoff value: 65 years of age) had a higher risk of complications and that patients with smaller stones (cutoff value: 0.8 cm) had a higher stone-free rate. This study showed that elderly patients with upper urinary tract stones undergoing shock wave lithotripsy had comparable efficacy for stone-free rates and retreatment rates, but higher complication rates.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 19 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 3 16%
Other 2 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 11%
Lecturer 1 5%
Researcher 1 5%
Other 3 16%
Unknown 7 37%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 8 42%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 16%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 5%
Unknown 7 37%