↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Changing patient safety culture in China: a case study of an experimental Chinese hospital from a comparative perspective

Overview of attention for article published in Risk Management and Healthcare Policy, May 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
65 Mendeley
Title
Changing patient safety culture in China: a case study of an experimental Chinese hospital from a comparative perspective
Published in
Risk Management and Healthcare Policy, May 2018
DOI 10.2147/rmhp.s151902
Pubmed ID
Authors

Xiao Ping Xu, Dong Ning Deng, Yong Hong Gu, Chui Shan Ng, Xiao Cai, Jun Xu, Xin Shi Zhang, Dong Ge Ke, Qian Hui Yu, Chi Kuen Chan

Abstract

The World Health Organization highlights that patient safety interventions are not lacking but that the local context affects their successful implementation. Increasing attention is being paid to patient safety in Mainland China, yet few studies focus on patient safety in organizations with mixed cultures. This paper evaluates the current patient safety culture in an experimental Chinese hospital with a Hong Kong hospital management culture, and it aims to explore the application of Hong Kong's patient safety strategies in the context of Mainland China. A quantitative survey of 307 hospital staff members was conducted using the Hospital Survey on Patient Safety Culture questionnaire. The findings were compared with a similar study on general Chinese hospitals and were appraised with reference to the Manchester Patient Safety Framework. Lower scores were observed among participants with the following characteristics: males, doctors, those with more work experience, those with higher education, and those from the general practice and otolaryngology departments. However, the case study hospital achieved better scores in management expectations, actions and support for patient safety, incident reporting and communication, and teamwork within units. Its weaknesses were related to non-punitive responses to errors, teamwork across units, and staffing. The case study hospital contributes to a changing patient safety culture in Mainland China, yet its patient safety culture remains mostly bureaucratic. Further efforts could be made to deepen the staff's patient safety culture mind-set, to realize a "bottom-up" approach to cultural change, to build up a comprehensive and integrated incident management system, and to improve team building and staffing for patient safety.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 65 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 65 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 10 15%
Student > Bachelor 7 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 11%
Lecturer 5 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 6%
Other 11 17%
Unknown 21 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 22 34%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 9%
Computer Science 3 5%
Psychology 2 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 3%
Other 8 12%
Unknown 22 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 May 2018.
All research outputs
#17,952,854
of 23,053,169 outputs
Outputs from Risk Management and Healthcare Policy
#441
of 628 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#236,669
of 326,174 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Risk Management and Healthcare Policy
#3
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,053,169 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 628 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.9. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 326,174 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.