Influence of PEGylation and RGD loading on the targeting properties of radiolabeled liposomal nanoparticles
International Journal of Nanomedicine, November 2012
Rangger, Helbok, Von Guggenberg, Radolf, Ruth Prassl, Andreae, Thurner, Haubner, Decristoforo, Sosabowski
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 42 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
|Readers by professional status||Count||As %|
|Student > Ph. D. Student||14||33%|
|Student > Master||9||21%|
|Student > Bachelor||4||10%|
|Readers by discipline||Count||As %|
|Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science||8||19%|
|Agricultural and Biological Sciences||8||19%|
|Medicine and Dentistry||6||14%|
|Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology||3||7%|
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 July 2019.
All research outputs
of 23,053,169 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Nanomedicine
of 3,841 outputs
Outputs of similar age
of 184,991 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Nanomedicine
of 48 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,053,169 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,841 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 184,991 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 48 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.