↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Chronotype differences in circadian rhythms of temperature, melatonin, and sleepiness as measured in a modified constant routine protocol

Overview of attention for article published in Nature and science of sleep, November 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#31 of 633)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
17 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
7 X users
patent
1 patent
facebook
2 Facebook pages
wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages
video
2 YouTube creators

Citations

dimensions_citation
119 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
175 Mendeley
Title
Chronotype differences in circadian rhythms of temperature, melatonin, and sleepiness as measured in a modified constant routine protocol
Published in
Nature and science of sleep, November 2009
DOI 10.2147/nss.s6234
Pubmed ID
Authors

Leon Lack, Michelle Bailey, Nicole Lovato, Helen Wright

Abstract

Evening chronotypes typically have sleep patterns timed 2-3 hours later than morning chronotypes. Ambulatory studies have suggested that differences in the timing of underlying circadian rhythms as a cause of the sleep period differences. However, differences in endogenous circadian rhythms are best explored in laboratory protocols such as the constant routine. We used a 27-hour modified constant routine to measure the endogenous core temperature and melatonin circadian rhythms as well as subjective and objective sleepiness from hourly 15-minute sleep opportunities. Ten (8f) morning type individuals were compared with 12 (8f) evening types. All were young, healthy, good sleepers. The typical sleep onset, arising times, circadian phase markers for temperature and melatonin and objective sleepiness were all 2-3 hours later for the evening types than morning types. However, consistent with past studies the differences for the subjective sleepiness rhythms were much greater (5-9 hours). Therefore, the present study supports the important role of subjective alertness/sleepiness in determining the sleep period differences between morning and evening types and the possible vulnerability of evening types to delayed sleep phase disorder.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 175 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Croatia 1 <1%
Russia 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Unknown 171 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 28 16%
Student > Bachelor 24 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 16 9%
Researcher 15 9%
Other 33 19%
Unknown 39 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 26 15%
Medicine and Dentistry 25 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 24 14%
Neuroscience 10 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 5%
Other 32 18%
Unknown 49 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 149. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 April 2024.
All research outputs
#283,167
of 25,806,080 outputs
Outputs from Nature and science of sleep
#31
of 633 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#614
of 109,900 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature and science of sleep
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,806,080 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 633 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 109,900 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them