Title |
Critical appraisal of the clinical utility of the dexamethasone intravitreal implant (Ozurdex<sup>®</sup>) for the treatment of macular edema related to branch retinal vein occlusion or central retinal vein occlusion
|
---|---|
Published in |
Clinical Ophthalmology, July 2011
|
DOI | 10.2147/opth.s13775 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Annie Chan, Loh-Shan Leung, Mark S Blumenkranz |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 54 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
India | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 53 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 20% |
Student > Master | 8 | 15% |
Student > Bachelor | 5 | 9% |
Researcher | 5 | 9% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 7% |
Other | 12 | 22% |
Unknown | 9 | 17% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 18 | 33% |
Engineering | 5 | 9% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 7% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 4 | 7% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 6% |
Other | 9 | 17% |
Unknown | 11 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 May 2015.
All research outputs
#8,882,501
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Ophthalmology
#848
of 3,788 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#48,171
of 131,101 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Ophthalmology
#8
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,788 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 131,101 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.