Title |
Ranpirnase and its potential for the treatment of unresectable malignant mesothelioma
|
---|---|
Published in |
Biologics: Targets & Therapy, August 2008
|
DOI | 10.2147/btt.s2383 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Camillo Porta, Chiara Paglino, Luciano Mutti |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 37 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 37 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 14% |
Student > Master | 5 | 14% |
Student > Bachelor | 5 | 14% |
Researcher | 4 | 11% |
Professor | 3 | 8% |
Other | 7 | 19% |
Unknown | 8 | 22% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 11 | 30% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 22% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 11% |
Chemistry | 4 | 11% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 3% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 9 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 October 2023.
All research outputs
#5,446,994
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Biologics: Targets & Therapy
#74
of 284 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,298
of 97,952 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biologics: Targets & Therapy
#6
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 284 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 97,952 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.