↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Deep vein thrombosis in bilateral lower extremities after hip fracture: a retrospective study of 463 patients

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Interventions in Aging, April 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
79 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
31 Mendeley
Title
Deep vein thrombosis in bilateral lower extremities after hip fracture: a retrospective study of 463 patients
Published in
Clinical Interventions in Aging, April 2018
DOI 10.2147/cia.s161191
Pubmed ID
Authors

Bin-Fei Zhang, Xing Wei, Hai Huang, Peng-Fei Wang, Ping Liu, Shuang-Wei Qu, Jia-Hao Li, Hu Wang, Yu-Xuan Cong, Yan Zhuang, Kun Zhang

Abstract

To investigate the incidences of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) before and after operation in inpatients with hip fractures in both lower extremities. We collected the clinical data of 463 patients with lower extremities fractures who presented at Xi'an Honghui Hospital between July 1, 2014, and October 31, 2016 and met all the inclusion criteria. Doppler ultrasonography was used to diagnose DVT. The patients were examined preoperatively and postoperatively and divided into the thrombosis and non-thrombosis group according to the ultrasonographic findings. We divided the DVT cases into central, peripheral, and mixed thromboses. The incidence of preoperative DVT was 34.98%, and the prevalence of DVT on the uninjured side was 13.60%. This composition ratio increased to 57.23% postoperatively, and the prevalence of DVT on the uninjured side was 25.05%. Age (odds ratio [OR], 1.03; 95% CI: 1.01-1.04; P=0.002), venous thrombosis at admission (OR, 4.05; 95% CI, 2.30-7.13; P=0.000), and the days between the fracture and the operation (OR, 1.10; 95% CI, 1.02-1.20; P=0.020) were the independent risk factors of preoperative DVT. Coronary heart disease (OR, 1.85; 95% CI: 1.18-2.89; P=0.007), venous thrombosis at admission (OR, 22.35; 95% CI: 6.78-73.60; P=0.000), days between fracture and operation (OR, 1.06; 95% CI: 1.01-1.11; P=0.021), and blood loss (OR, 1.002; 95% CI: 1.000-1.003; P=0.014) were independent risk factors of postoperative DVT. The actual incidence of DVT after hip fracture may be underestimated. The incidences of preoperative and postoperative DVTs and the incidence of DVT on the uninjured limb were high.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 31 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 4 13%
Student > Master 3 10%
Student > Bachelor 3 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 6%
Other 2 6%
Other 5 16%
Unknown 12 39%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 12 39%
Computer Science 2 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 3%
Other 2 6%
Unknown 12 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 May 2018.
All research outputs
#19,951,180
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Interventions in Aging
#1,407
of 1,968 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#252,686
of 343,807 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Interventions in Aging
#43
of 50 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,968 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.1. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 343,807 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 50 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.