↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Epidemiology, diagnosis, and management of atrial fibrillation in women

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Women's Health, June 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
30 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
60 Mendeley
Title
Epidemiology, diagnosis, and management of atrial fibrillation in women
Published in
International Journal of Women's Health, June 2015
DOI 10.2147/ijwh.s45925
Pubmed ID
Authors

Daniela Poli, Emilia Antonucci

Abstract

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common arrhythmia and has become a serious public health problem. Moreover, epidemiological data demonstrate that incidence and prevalence of AF are increasing. Several differences in epidemiological patterns, clinical manifestations, and incidence of stroke have been reported between AF in women and in men, particularly in elderly women. Elderly women have higher blood pressure than men and a higher prevalence of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction, both independent risk factors for stroke. On the basis of the evidence on the higher stroke risk among AF in women, recently, female sex has been accepted as a risk factor for stroke and adopted to stratify patients, especially if they are not at high risk for stroke. This review focuses on available evidence on sex differences in AF patients, and examines factors contributing to different stroke risk, diagnosis, and prognosis of arrhythmia in women, with the aim to provide an analysis of the available evidence.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 60 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 2%
Netherlands 1 2%
Unknown 58 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 15 25%
Researcher 10 17%
Student > Postgraduate 6 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 7%
Student > Master 4 7%
Other 12 20%
Unknown 9 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 24 40%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 8%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 7%
Mathematics 2 3%
Other 6 10%
Unknown 15 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 November 2022.
All research outputs
#3,856,958
of 23,153,849 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Women's Health
#184
of 793 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#49,390
of 268,320 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Women's Health
#6
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,153,849 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 793 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 268,320 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.