↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Adequate nutrition status important for bone mineral density improvement in a patient with anorexia nervosa

Overview of attention for article published in Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management, May 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
20 Mendeley
Title
Adequate nutrition status important for bone mineral density improvement in a patient with anorexia nervosa
Published in
Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management, May 2018
DOI 10.2147/tcrm.s160280
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yukio Nakamura, Mikio Kamimura, Hidefumi Koiwai, Hiroyuki Kato

Abstract

Low bone mineral density (BMD) is one of the most frequent complications of anorexia nervosa (AN). We report the clinical outcomes of a female patient with severe AN, whose chest had become deformed due to thoracic fracture. Lumbar BMD was 0.358 g/cm2 (T-score = -6.3), and total hip BMD was 0.411 g/cm2 (T-score = -4.4). Active vitamin D increased these parameters by 81.0% and 57.4%, respectively, but a drop in her nutrition status afterward resulted in a sharp decrease in BMD values. These findings suggest that adequate nutrient intake is essential for effective osteoporosis treatment in patients with AN.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 20 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 10%
Student > Master 2 10%
Professor 1 5%
Lecturer 1 5%
Other 2 10%
Unknown 9 45%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 6 30%
Psychology 2 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 5%
Sports and Recreations 1 5%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 5%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 9 45%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 May 2018.
All research outputs
#17,292,294
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management
#926
of 1,323 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#219,253
of 339,234 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management
#20
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,323 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.6. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 339,234 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.