↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Reversal of echocardiographic right-sided heart pathology in a dog with severe pulmonary hypertension: a case report

Overview of attention for article published in Veterinary Medicine : Research and Reports, June 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
11 Mendeley
Title
Reversal of echocardiographic right-sided heart pathology in a dog with severe pulmonary hypertension: a case report
Published in
Veterinary Medicine : Research and Reports, June 2015
DOI 10.2147/vmrr.s84181
Pubmed ID
Authors

Peggy McMahon, Carley Saelinger

Abstract

Pathologic right-sided heart changes are a common echocardiographic finding in patients with pulmonary hypertension (PH). Canines with PH may have right heart pathology documented via echocardiographic color Doppler interrogation including tricuspid valve regurgitation, pulmonic valve insufficiency, elevated pulmonary arterial systolic pressure, elevated pulmonary arterial diastolic pressure, and alterations in ejection profiles. Two-dimensional echocardiographic findings may include right ventricular hypertrophy, interventricular septal flattening, paradoxical interventricular septal motion, pulmonary artery dilation, and potentially abnormal left heart dimensions. In veterinary medicine, much confidence is given to the measurement of pulmonary arterial systolic pressure estimated from tricuspid valve regurgitation to grade the severity of PH and monitor its improvement with little emphasis placed on the integration of two-dimensional echocardiographic right and left heart pathology in conjunction with Doppler findings. To the authors' knowledge, marked improvement and/or resolution of echocardiographic-documented right heart pathology have not been previously reported in the veterinary literature. This case report documents profound echocardiographic improvement of right-sided heart disease in a dog with severe PH.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 11 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 2 18%
Other 2 18%
Lecturer 1 9%
Student > Bachelor 1 9%
Unknown 5 45%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 4 36%
Computer Science 1 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 9%
Unknown 5 45%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 June 2015.
All research outputs
#22,756,649
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Veterinary Medicine : Research and Reports
#117
of 135 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#240,020
of 281,399 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Veterinary Medicine : Research and Reports
#10
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 135 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 23.6. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 281,399 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.