| Title |
Validity and reliability of the Turkish version of CRAFFT Substance Abuse Screening Test among adolescents
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment, June 2015
|
| DOI | 10.2147/ndt.s82232 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Hasan Kandemir, Ömer Aydemir, Suat Ekinci, Salih Selek, Sultan B Kandemir, Hüseyin Bayazit |
| Abstract |
This study aimed to validate the CRAFFT diagnostic test, against the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders - Fourth Edition, Axis 1-based diagnostic inventory in a Turkish population of adolescents. The 124 adolescents who were 15-18 years old were enrolled to this study. CRAFFT was self-administered. Interviews took approximately 30 minutes, including the DSM-IV diagnostic interview for alcohol/drug dependence. The mean age of subjects was 16.653 years (minimum: 15 years, maximum: 18 years). A score of 2 or higher in part B was found to be optimal for detecting youths with substance dependence problems (sensitivity: 0.82; specificity: 0.88) and it was sufficiently discriminative. The CRAFFT is a valid and reliable instrument for identifying Turkish-speaking youths at risk for substance use disorders. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 33 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 33 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 9 | 27% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 9% |
| Lecturer | 2 | 6% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 9 | 27% |
| Unknown | 4 | 12% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 21% |
| Psychology | 7 | 21% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 12% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 12% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 9% |
| Other | 3 | 9% |
| Unknown | 5 | 15% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 September 2015.
All research outputs
#7,047,002
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment
#888
of 3,132 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#77,282
of 281,399 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment
#26
of 80 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,132 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 281,399 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 80 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.