↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Influences of peers’ and family members’ body shapes on perception of body image and desire for thinness in Japanese female students

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Women's Health, June 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
44 Mendeley
Title
Influences of peers’ and family members’ body shapes on perception of body image and desire for thinness in Japanese female students
Published in
International Journal of Women's Health, June 2015
DOI 10.2147/ijwh.s82193
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tomoki Mase, Kumiko Ohara, Chiemi Miyawaki, Katsuyasu Kouda, Harunobu Nakamura

Abstract

The present study investigated the influence of peers' and family members' body shapes on the perception of body image and desire for thinness in Japanese female students. The study included 342 female, Japanese university students between the ages of 18 years and 22 years. They completed an anonymous questionnaire, which included questions related to anthropometry and body perception. Eating behavior was assessed by the Japanese version of the Eating Attitude Test-26. Many students overestimated their body shape (81.2% of underweight students and 74.6% of normal students) and had a desire for thinness (41.0% of underweight students, 88.2% of normal students, and 100% of overweight students). One of the main reasons for the overestimation of their body shape was comparison with others. Participants who were interested in a friend's body shape were almost three times more likely to have a desire for thinness than those who were not interested in a female friend's body shape (odds ratio: 3.06, P=0.014). The results indicate a possibility that a female Japanese student's young female friends' body shapes, influences her desire for thinness or her perception of her own body shape.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 44 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 44 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 8 18%
Student > Master 6 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 7%
Lecturer 2 5%
Other 8 18%
Unknown 13 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 11 25%
Psychology 10 23%
Sports and Recreations 2 5%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 2%
Unspecified 1 2%
Other 4 9%
Unknown 15 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 June 2015.
All research outputs
#15,338,777
of 22,815,414 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Women's Health
#494
of 770 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#157,017
of 267,518 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Women's Health
#17
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,815,414 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 770 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.7. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 267,518 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.