↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Anti-factor Xa levels in obese patients receiving enoxaparin for treatment and prophylaxis indications

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Pharmacology : Advances and Applications, May 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
30 Mendeley
Title
Anti-factor Xa levels in obese patients receiving enoxaparin for treatment and prophylaxis indications
Published in
Clinical Pharmacology : Advances and Applications, May 2018
DOI 10.2147/cpaa.s161599
Pubmed ID
Authors

Linda Tahaineh, Sahar M Edaily, Shadi F Gharaibeh

Abstract

To evaluate the degree of anticoagulation achieved with different enoxaparin dosing regimens used in obese and morbidly obese patients in a hospital setting in Jordan. All obese adult patients who were prescribed enoxaparin for various indications were invited to participate in the study. The anti-factor Xa (anti-Xa) level was checked once after 4-6 hours of the third or fourth dose of enoxaparin (at steady state). Patients were followed daily to evaluate drug efficacy and safety through their hospital course. Enoxaparin daily dose used for prophylaxis indications ranged from 0.3 to 0.85 mg/kg and from 0.31 to 2.25 mg/kg in case of certain treatment indications. Most participants who received enoxaparin for treatment indications (76.9%) were on capping dosing regimens, which was <1 mg/kg twice daily. On the other hand, most patients (88.5%) who received enoxaparin for prophylaxis indications were on a fixed 40 mg/d dose. Among the 52 patients who completed the study, 19 patients (36.5%) had therapeutic anti-Xa levels. The results showed no statistically significant associations between regimens that were used and achieving therapeutic anti-Xa level (p>0.05). No bleeding events or thrombocytopenia were noticed, and there was one case of recurrent thrombosis. Enoxaparin dosing regimens that were used for obese patients varied based on prescribing physicians. Regardless of the regimen used, the majority of participants had nontherapeutic anti-Xa. Individualized dosing regimens based on anti-Xa levels are warranted for obese patients on enoxaparin.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 30 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 30 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 5 17%
Student > Bachelor 5 17%
Student > Master 4 13%
Researcher 2 7%
Student > Postgraduate 2 7%
Other 3 10%
Unknown 9 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 11 37%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 23%
Social Sciences 1 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 3%
Unknown 10 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 May 2018.
All research outputs
#20,838,437
of 25,604,262 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Pharmacology : Advances and Applications
#147
of 179 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#265,503
of 339,763 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Pharmacology : Advances and Applications
#3
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,604,262 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 179 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.9. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 339,763 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.