| Title |
Association of FGFR2 and PI3KCA genetic variants with the risk of breast cancer in a Chinese population
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cancer Management and Research, May 2018
|
| DOI | 10.2147/cmar.s164084 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Yang Wang, Haiyu Zhang, Mingzhen Lin, Yongsheng Wang |
| Abstract |
Genome-wide association studies have found plenty of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) which are associated with breast cancer risk. SNPs in FGFR2 are mostly identified. However, the association between PI3KCA SNP and breast cancer risk remains largely unknown. The aim of this study was to investigate the significance of FGFR2 and PI3KCA genetic variants in breast cancer and their association with prognosis. We performed genotyping of 328 breast cancer patients and 389 healthy controls. Then, we evaluated the associations of FGFR2 rs1219648 and PI3KCA rs6443624 with the susceptibility and clinicopathological features of breast cancer. Kaplan-Meier curve with log-rank test was performed to determine the prognostic values of FGFR2 rs1219648 and PI3KCA rs6443624. The results indicated that genotype frequencies of rs1219648 and rs6443624 were significantly different between breast cancer patients and healthy controls. Furthermore, PI3KCA rs6443624 A carriers and FGFR2 rs1219648 G carriers more frequently had advanced stages and shorter survival times. The SNPs of FGFR2 rs1219648 and PI3KCA rs6443624 may contribute to the identification of breast cancer patients at risk of more aggressive disease and may be potential prognostic factors in breast cancer in a Chinese population. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 18 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 4 | 22% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 17% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 11% |
| Other | 1 | 6% |
| Librarian | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 6 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 33% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 11% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 6% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 6% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 6 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 May 2018.
All research outputs
#15,656,702
of 23,267,128 outputs
Outputs from Cancer Management and Research
#736
of 2,022 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#208,635
of 326,760 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cancer Management and Research
#23
of 61 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,267,128 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,022 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 326,760 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 61 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.