↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

CANTAB object recognition and language tests to detect aging cognitive decline: an exploratory comparative study

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Interventions in Aging, December 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
41 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
89 Mendeley
Title
CANTAB object recognition and language tests to detect aging cognitive decline: an exploratory comparative study
Published in
Clinical Interventions in Aging, December 2014
DOI 10.2147/cia.s68186
Pubmed ID
Authors

Fernanda Cabral Soares, Thaís Cristina Galdino de Oliveira, Liliane Dias e Dias de Macedo, Alessandra Mendonça Tomás, Domingos Luiz Wanderley Picanço-Diniz, João Bento-Torres, Natáli Valim Oliver Bento-Torres, Cristovam Wanderley Picanço-Diniz

Twitter Demographics

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 89 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 1%
Bulgaria 1 1%
Unknown 87 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 20%
Student > Bachelor 11 12%
Student > Master 10 11%
Researcher 9 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 9%
Other 17 19%
Unknown 16 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 17 19%
Neuroscience 15 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 15 17%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 8%
Sports and Recreations 4 4%
Other 9 10%
Unknown 22 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 June 2015.
All research outputs
#15,338,777
of 22,815,414 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Interventions in Aging
#1,153
of 1,839 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#209,092
of 353,290 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Interventions in Aging
#75
of 141 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,815,414 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,839 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.8. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 353,290 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 141 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.