↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Transcranial magnetic stimulation for the treatment of major depression

Overview of attention for article published in Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment, June 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#6 of 3,141)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
52 news outlets
blogs
8 blogs
policy
1 policy source
twitter
17 X users
patent
2 patents
facebook
2 Facebook pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
93 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
251 Mendeley
Title
Transcranial magnetic stimulation for the treatment of major depression
Published in
Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment, June 2015
DOI 10.2147/ndt.s67477
Pubmed ID
Authors

Philip G Janicak, Mehmet E Dokucu

Abstract

Major depression is often difficult to diagnose accurately. Even when the diagnosis is properly made, standard treatment approaches (eg, psychotherapy, medications, or their combination) are often inadequate to control acute symptoms or maintain initial benefit. Additional obstacles involve safety and tolerability problems, which frequently preclude an adequate course of treatment. This leaves an important gap in our ability to properly manage major depression in a substantial proportion of patients, leaving them vulnerable to ensuing complications (eg, employment-related disability, increased risk of suicide, comorbid medical disorders, and substance abuse). Thus, there is a need for more effective and better tolerated approaches. Transcranial magnetic stimulation is a neuromodulation technique increasingly used to partly fill this therapeutic void. In the context of treating depression, we critically review the development of transcranial magnetic stimulation, focusing on the results of controlled and pragmatic trials for depression, which consider its efficacy, safety, and tolerability.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 251 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Croatia 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 249 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 40 16%
Student > Bachelor 37 15%
Researcher 28 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 26 10%
Other 14 6%
Other 44 18%
Unknown 62 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 58 23%
Neuroscience 40 16%
Psychology 30 12%
Engineering 13 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 3%
Other 32 13%
Unknown 70 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 486. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 February 2024.
All research outputs
#54,886
of 25,576,275 outputs
Outputs from Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment
#6
of 3,141 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#504
of 281,797 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment
#2
of 80 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,576,275 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,141 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 281,797 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 80 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.