| Title |
Animal models of polymicrobial pneumonia
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Drug Design, Development and Therapy, June 2015
|
| DOI | 10.2147/dddt.s70993 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sami Hraiech, Laurent Papazian, Jean-Marc Rolain, Fabienne Bregeon |
| Abstract |
Pneumonia is one of the leading causes of severe and occasionally life-threatening infections. The physiopathology of pneumonia has been extensively studied, providing information for the development of new treatments for this condition. In addition to in vitro research, animal models have been largely used in the field of pneumonia. Several models have been described and have provided a better understanding of pneumonia under different settings and with various pathogens. However, the concept of one pathogen leading to one infection has been challenged, and recent flu epidemics suggest that some pathogens exhibit highly virulent potential. Although "two hits" animal models have been used to study infectious diseases, few of these models have been described in pneumonia. Therefore the aims of this review were to provide an overview of the available literature in this field, to describe well-studied and uncommon pathogen associations, and to summarize the major insights obtained from this information. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 50% |
| India | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
| Scientists | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 93 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 93 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 17% |
| Researcher | 13 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 12 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 11% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 11 | 12% |
| Unknown | 27 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 16 | 17% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 16 | 17% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 14 | 15% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 5% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 5 | 5% |
| Unknown | 32 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 January 2023.
All research outputs
#6,754,462
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Drug Design, Development and Therapy
#427
of 2,268 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#73,404
of 281,411 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Drug Design, Development and Therapy
#21
of 126 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,268 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 281,411 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 126 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.