↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Case-finding for COPD in primary care: a qualitative study of patients’ perspectives

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, May 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (63rd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (58th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
52 Mendeley
Title
Case-finding for COPD in primary care: a qualitative study of patients’ perspectives
Published in
International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, May 2018
DOI 10.2147/copd.s147718
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alexandra Enocson, Kate Jolly, Rachel Elizabeth Jordan, David A Fitzmaurice, SM Greenfield, Peymane Adab

Abstract

COPD is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality, yet it remains largely under-diagnosed. Case-finding is encouraged by many professionals, but there is a lack of information on the patients' views and perspectives. Semistructured interviews were conducted with adults, aged 40 years or older with a history of smoking, who were eligible and invited for case-finding for COPD as a part of a large UK primary care trial. Patients, including those who consented or declined participation and those with and without COPD after screening, were interviewed. Interviews were transcribed and analyzed using the framework method. The 43 interviews revealed the following two main categories of themes: patients' views on COPD case-finding and barriers to case-finding. Overall, case-finding was deemed important and beneficial. Participants highlighted the need for screening activities to be convenient for patients but perceived that general practitioners (GPs) lacked the time and accessing appointments was difficult. Desire for a health check among symptomatic patients facilitated participation in case-finding. Psychological barriers to engagement included denial of ill health or failure to recognize symptoms, fear of the "test", and lung symptoms being low on the hierarchy of patient health complaints. Mechanical barriers included providing care for another person (and therefore being too busy), being unable to access GP appointments, and lacking feedback of spirometry results or communication of the diagnosis. Patient engagement with case-finding may be limited by denial or lack of recognition of symptoms and physical barriers to attendance. Increasing public awareness of COPD risk factors and early symptoms may enhance case-finding.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 52 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 52 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 11 21%
Researcher 8 15%
Student > Master 5 10%
Student > Postgraduate 4 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 6%
Other 6 12%
Unknown 15 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 14 27%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 15%
Social Sciences 4 8%
Psychology 3 6%
Computer Science 1 2%
Other 5 10%
Unknown 17 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 June 2022.
All research outputs
#7,359,319
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
#863
of 2,578 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#119,630
of 339,234 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
#33
of 79 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,578 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 339,234 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 79 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.