↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Decreased survival in patients with carcinoma of axillary tail versus upper outer quadrant breast cancers: a SEER population-based study

Overview of attention for article published in Cancer Management and Research, May 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (61st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
14 Mendeley
Title
Decreased survival in patients with carcinoma of axillary tail versus upper outer quadrant breast cancers: a SEER population-based study
Published in
Cancer Management and Research, May 2018
DOI 10.2147/cmar.s165291
Pubmed ID
Authors

Zong-Chao Gou, Xi-Yu Liu, Yi Xiao, Shen Zhao, Yi-Zhou Jiang, Zhi-Ming Shao

Abstract

Carcinoma of the axillary tail of Spence (CATS) is a poorly studied type of breast cancer. The clinicopathological characteristics and prognostic features of CATS are unclear. Using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database, we identified 149,026 patients diagnosed with upper outer quadrant breast cancer (UOBC) (n=146,343) or CATS (n=2,683). The median follow-up was 88 months. The primary and secondary outcomes were breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) and overall survival. The survival outcomes of UOBC and CATS were compared using competing risks analysis, log-rank test, Cox proportional hazards regression model, and propensity score matching method. Multivariate logistic regression was utilized to present the relationship between CATS and lymph node (LN) metastasis. CATS presented a higher grade, higher negative hormone receptor rate, and more positive nodal metastasis. The 10-year BCSS rate was worse for CATS than for UOBC (85.1% vs 87.3%, P=0.001). The multivariate Cox analysis showed a higher hazard ratio (HR) for CATS over UOBC (BCSS: HR =1.20, P=0.001; overall survival: HR =1.11, P=0.019). The difference in the BCSS was also observed in a 1:1 matched cohort (BCSS P=0.019). A subgroup analysis revealed the inferior outcomes of CATS in the metastatic LN subgroup and the hormone receptor-negative subgroup. The multivariate logistic regression indicated that CATS is an independent contributing factor to LN metastasis. CATS had distinct clinicopathological characteristics and was more likely associated with LN metastasis. Compared to UOBC, CATS had adverse impacts on BCSS.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 14 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 14 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 2 14%
Student > Bachelor 2 14%
Student > Master 2 14%
Student > Postgraduate 2 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 7%
Other 3 21%
Unknown 2 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 5 36%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 7%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 7%
Engineering 1 7%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 5 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 May 2021.
All research outputs
#7,048,788
of 23,065,445 outputs
Outputs from Cancer Management and Research
#303
of 2,017 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#121,729
of 326,208 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cancer Management and Research
#10
of 61 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,065,445 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,017 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 326,208 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 61 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.