↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Clinical utility of brain stimulation modalities following traumatic brain injury: current evidence

Overview of attention for article published in Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment, June 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (52nd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (53rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
73 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
134 Mendeley
Title
Clinical utility of brain stimulation modalities following traumatic brain injury: current evidence
Published in
Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment, June 2015
DOI 10.2147/ndt.s65816
Pubmed ID
Authors

Shasha Li, Ana Luiza Zaninotto, Iuri Santana Neville, Wellingson Silva Paiva, Danuza Nunn, Felipe Fregni

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 134 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 129 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 21 16%
Student > Master 17 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 12%
Student > Bachelor 10 7%
Other 9 7%
Other 31 23%
Unknown 30 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 31 23%
Neuroscience 26 19%
Psychology 14 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 4%
Other 14 10%
Unknown 35 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 October 2023.
All research outputs
#15,055,192
of 25,998,826 outputs
Outputs from Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment
#1,291
of 3,155 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#134,502
of 285,143 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment
#35
of 80 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,998,826 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,155 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 285,143 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 80 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.