| Title |
A 5-serum miRNA panel for the early detection of colorectal cancer
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
OncoTargets and therapy, May 2018
|
| DOI | 10.2147/ott.s153535 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Shaohua Guo, Jiajin Zhang, Baishi Wang, Bingdong Zhang, Xuning Wang, Liang Huang, Hongyi Liu, Baoqing Jia |
| Abstract |
The study aimed to screen microRNAs (miRNAs) that can be used for the early detection of colorectal cancer (CRC) based on differential expression of miRNA in serum. A three-stage study was designed with a total of 217 CRCs, 168 colorectal adenomas (CRAs), and 190 healthy controls (HCs). A quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction was performed in three stages. We screened 528 miRNA expression profiles in the sera of 40 patients (CRC n=20, CRA n=10, and HC n=10) for candidate miRNAs, then 210 serum samples (CRC n=90, CRA n=60, and HC n=60) were used for screening of candidate miRNAs. Three hundred and twenty-five independent individual samples (CRC n=107, CRA n=98, and HC n=120) were used to validate the most differentially-expressed miRNAs in the screening stage, and binary logistic regression was used in the validation stage. A receiver operating characteristic curve was drawn to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy. A 5-serum miRNA panel (miRNA-1246, miRNA-202-3p, miRNA-21-3p, miRNA-1229-3p, and miRNA-532-3p) effectively distinguished CRCs from HCs with 91.6% sensitivity and 91.7% specificity. The area under the curve (AUC) was 0.960 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.937-0.983). In addition, the panel also accurately distinguished CRCs from CRAs with 94.4% sensitivity and 84.7% specificity. The AUC was 0.951 (95% CI: 0.922-0.980). Our 5-serum miRNA panel accurately distinguished CRCs from CRAs and HCs with high sensitivity and specificity. The 5-serum miRNA panel may be a promising prospect for application as a nonintrusive and inexpensive method for the early detection of CRC. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 32 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 32 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 8 | 25% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 16% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 13% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 6% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 4 | 13% |
| Unknown | 7 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 13 | 41% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 19% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 6% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 6% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 7 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 May 2018.
All research outputs
#16,642,835
of 25,461,852 outputs
Outputs from OncoTargets and therapy
#981
of 3,021 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#206,428
of 339,442 outputs
Outputs of similar age from OncoTargets and therapy
#44
of 95 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,461,852 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,021 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 339,442 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 95 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.