↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

A facile doxorubicin-dichloroacetate conjugate nanomedicine with high drug loading for safe drug delivery

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Nanomedicine, March 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (60th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
23 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
36 Mendeley
Title
A facile doxorubicin-dichloroacetate conjugate nanomedicine with high drug loading for safe drug delivery
Published in
International Journal of Nanomedicine, March 2018
DOI 10.2147/ijn.s154361
Pubmed ID
Authors

Conglian Yang, Tingting Wu, Yuting Qin, Yan Qi, Yu Sun, Miao Kong, Xue Jiang, Xianya Qin, Yaqi Shen, Zhiping Zhang

Abstract

Doxorubicin (DOX) is an effective chemotherapeutic agent but severe side effects limit its clinical application. Nanoformulations can reduce the toxicity while still have various limitations, such as complexity, low drug loading capability and excipient related concerns. An amphiphilic conjugate, doxorubicin-dichloroacetate, was synthesized and the corresponding nanoparticles were prepared. The in vitro cytotoxicity and intracellular uptake, in vivo imaging, antitumor effects and systemic toxicities of nanoparticles were carried out to evaluate the therapeutic efficiency of tumor. Doxorubicin-dichloroacetate conjugate can self-assemble into nanoparticles with small amount of DSPE-PEG2000, leading to high drug loading (71.8%, w/w) and diminished excipient associated concerns. The nanoparticles exhibited invisible systemic toxicity and high maximum tolerated dose of 75 mg DOX equiv./kg, which was 15-fold higher than that of free DOX. It also showed good tumor targeting capability and enhanced antitumor efficacy in murine melanoma model. This work provides a promising strategy to simplify the drug preparation process, increase drug loading content, reduce systemic toxicity as well as enhance antitumor efficiency.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 36 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 7 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 17%
Student > Bachelor 5 14%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 6%
Researcher 2 6%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 13 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 14%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 14%
Chemistry 3 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 6%
Other 4 11%
Unknown 14 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 December 2019.
All research outputs
#8,264,793
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Nanomedicine
#1,008
of 4,122 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#134,821
of 344,853 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Nanomedicine
#15
of 81 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,122 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 344,853 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 81 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.