↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Ocular manifestations of graft-versus-host disease: 10 years’ experience

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Ophthalmology, July 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 X user
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
39 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
30 Mendeley
Title
Ocular manifestations of graft-versus-host disease: 10 years’ experience
Published in
Clinical Ophthalmology, July 2015
DOI 10.2147/opth.s84704
Pubmed ID
Authors

Xihui Lin, Harrison Dwight Cavanagh

Abstract

To evaluate the ocular presentation, treatment, and clinical course of graft-versus-host disease (GVHD). Retrospective case series. Two hundred and forty-nine patients with systemic GVHD were included in the study. Ocular and systemic data were collected from 2003 to 2013. Mortality, visual acuity, and response of ocular symptoms. Sixty-four patients had ocular manifestations (25.7%). At presentation, the mean age was 44.5 years and mean latency was 16.4 months. The most common presentations were keratoconjunctivitis sicca, cataract, blepharitis, ocular hypertension, and filamentary keratitis. Visual acuity at presentation was 20/49; at the worst point in the disease was 20/115; and at most recent visit was 20/63. When topical anti-inflammatory drops were used in addition to tears, 54.3% of patients' ocular symptoms stabilized. When autologous serum was used in addition, 80% stabilized. The overall 10-year mortality of GVHD was 29.7%. For those with ocular involvement, it was 21.9%. Systemic GVHD has a high mortality rate, but ocular involvement does not suggest a worse prognosis. The main ocular presentations were keratoconjunctivitis sicca, cataracts, and ocular hypertension. Dry eyes in this population were very severe with overall worsening in visual acuity. However, with a step-wise approach involving topical anti-inflammatory medications and autologous serum tears, ocular symptoms do improve. It is important to monitor these patients closely, as they are prone to serious ocular complications such as corneal perforation and endophthalmitis.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 30 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 30 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 7 23%
Researcher 6 20%
Student > Bachelor 4 13%
Other 4 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 10%
Other 3 10%
Unknown 3 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 20 67%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 3%
Unknown 7 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 June 2020.
All research outputs
#7,047,742
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Ophthalmology
#580
of 3,712 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#75,554
of 277,613 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Ophthalmology
#9
of 86 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,712 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 277,613 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 86 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.