↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Patient satisfaction with the BETACONNECT™ autoinjector for interferon beta-1b

Overview of attention for article published in Patient preference and adherence, July 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (52nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
20 Mendeley
Title
Patient satisfaction with the BETACONNECT™ autoinjector for interferon beta-1b
Published in
Patient preference and adherence, July 2015
DOI 10.2147/ppa.s85917
Pubmed ID
Authors

Carmen Koch, Anna Saake, Thomas Schreiner, Julika Vogelreuter, Nicolas Petroff, Ivonne Weller

Abstract

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a chronic demyelinating, degenerative disease requiring long-term treatment. Patient adherence to treatment may be challenging in such scenarios, especially since treatment often involves self-injection, for example, with interferon beta-1b during therapy. BETACONNECT™ is a novel electronic autoinjector for patient support in interferon beta-1b administration. The purpose of this survey was to assess patient satisfaction with the BETACONNECT™ device and its features. A total of 2,299 MS patients using the BETACONNECT™ device were asked to participate in a survey in October 2014. All of these candidates participated in the BETAPLUS(®) program and had provided written informed consent. The participants were asked to answer 13 device-related questions. Of these candidates, 1,365 replied to the questionnaire, with more than 60% of the participants being 40-59 years of age. Among them, 69% were women and 21% were men (10% not specified). Approximately half of the participants received treatment with interferon beta-1b for more than 5 years. Most participants (85%) had used self-injection devices before, with 59% previously using BETACOMFORT(®), 23% using BETAJECT(®) Comfort, and 3% using BETAJECT(®) Lite, while less than 4% manually injected interferon beta-1b. The majority of the participants had received the BETACONNECT™ device from a BETAPLUS(®) nurse (87%) and 48% had already used the device for more than 2 months (49% for 2 months or less). Among the participants, more than 90% evaluated the BETACONNECT™ device as "very helpful" or "helpful" in supporting their interferon beta-1b therapy with only marginal sex differences. Features that were rated "very important" by more than half of the participants included adjustability of injection speed and depth, contact sensor for avoidance of unintentional release, optical and acoustic signals, and rechargeable battery. The vast majority of patients rated the BETACONNECT™ device as very helpful or helpful for their treatment with interferon beta-1b, and many considered most features as "very important". In conclusion, usage of the BETACONNECT™ autoinjector may facilitate interferon beta-1b therapy and support adherence to long-term therapeutic regimen.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 5%
Unknown 19 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 3 15%
Other 2 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 10%
Researcher 2 10%
Other 2 10%
Unknown 7 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 2 10%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 5%
Other 4 20%
Unknown 8 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 July 2015.
All research outputs
#16,045,990
of 25,368,786 outputs
Outputs from Patient preference and adherence
#914
of 1,757 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#146,209
of 277,585 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Patient preference and adherence
#22
of 53 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,368,786 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,757 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.5. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 277,585 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 53 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.