↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

The impact of coping strategies of cancer caregivers on psychophysiological outcomes: an integrative review

Overview of attention for article published in Psychology Research and Behavior Management, May 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
66 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
168 Mendeley
Title
The impact of coping strategies of cancer caregivers on psychophysiological outcomes: an integrative review
Published in
Psychology Research and Behavior Management, May 2018
DOI 10.2147/prbm.s164946
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ricardo João Teixeira, Allison J Applebaum, Sangeeta Bhatia, Tânia Brandão

Abstract

A growing number of studies have explored the psychosocial burden experienced by cancer caregivers, but less attention has been given to the psychophysiological impact of caregiving and the impact of caregivers' coping strategies on this association. This paper reviews existing research on the processes underlying distress experienced by cancer caregivers, with a specific focus on the role of coping strategies on psychophysiological correlates of burden. A broad literature search was conducted in health-related databases namely MEDLINE, Science Citations Index Expanded, Scopus, and PsycINFO, using relevant search terms. All types of studies published in English were considered for inclusion. We found that cancer caregiving was related to increased blood pressure, dysregulation of autonomic nervous system, hypothalamic-pituitary-axis dysregulation, immune changes, and poor health-related behaviors. We also found that problem-focused coping was associated with decreased caregiver burden, decreased depression, and better adjustment, while emotion-focused coping was related to higher levels of posttraumatic growth and psychological distress. The way coping impacts psychophysiological correlates of burden, however, remains unexplored. A better understanding of the psychophysiological elements of caregiver burden is needed. We propose a model that attends specifically to factors that may impact psychophysiological correlates of burden among cancer caregivers. Based on the proposed model, psychosocial interventions that specifically target caregivers' coping and emotion regulation skills, family functioning, and self-care are endemic to the preservation of the health and well-being of this vulnerable population.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 168 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 168 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 26 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 11%
Student > Bachelor 15 9%
Researcher 13 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 7%
Other 24 14%
Unknown 60 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 32 19%
Nursing and Health Professions 27 16%
Medicine and Dentistry 21 13%
Computer Science 5 3%
Neuroscience 3 2%
Other 13 8%
Unknown 67 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 May 2018.
All research outputs
#15,523,867
of 23,072,295 outputs
Outputs from Psychology Research and Behavior Management
#350
of 569 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#207,911
of 326,213 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Psychology Research and Behavior Management
#8
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,072,295 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 569 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.7. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 326,213 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.