↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Article Metrics

Cognitive and psychological profiles in treatment compliance: a study in an elderly population with hemophilia

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Interventions in Aging, January 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
44 Mendeley
Title
Cognitive and psychological profiles in treatment compliance: a study in an elderly population with hemophilia
Published in
Clinical Interventions in Aging, January 2015
DOI 10.2147/cia.s84749
Pubmed ID
Authors

Silvia Riva, Elena Santagostino, Alessandro Nobili, Maria Elisa Mancuso, Codjo Djignefa Djade, Gabriella Pravettoni

Abstract

Elderly patients with hemophilia have to face new challenges linked to concomitant pathologies and concurrent use of different treatments. In order to promote optimal care in the elderly hemophilia population, this study is aimed to analyze treatment compliance in relation to the presence of comorbidities and the role of potential determinants that can affect compliance (positively or negatively), including health-related quality of life, cognitive decline, and sociodemographic parameters (eg, living situation, partnership, presence of caregivers). This will be an observational study of elderly patients with hemophilia (aged >60 years). Patients will be interviewed during their routine medical visits. The data interview will pertaining to several dimension of treatment management. This study will detect more vulnerable patients with special care needs and will highlight psychological factors that should be considered for future psychosocial interventions.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 44 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 44 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 10 23%
Researcher 7 16%
Student > Bachelor 6 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 5%
Other 6 14%
Unknown 8 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 8 18%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 5 11%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 9%
Social Sciences 4 9%
Psychology 3 7%
Other 7 16%
Unknown 13 30%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 July 2015.
All research outputs
#2,836,997
of 5,342,946 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Interventions in Aging
#409
of 777 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#101,871
of 185,398 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Interventions in Aging
#30
of 65 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 5,342,946 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 777 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 185,398 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 65 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.